It’s Just Not App-ening, Part 3
I work for a restaurant that has a partnership with an e-wallet app. There are two types of discounts available with the app:
- A restaurant discount voucher, purchased via the “Deals of The Day” section in the [E-Wallet] app. The voucher code is applied by us and shows up on the receipt.
- An app discount that is applied in the app; the details can be found in the “Payment History” section. Our restaurant does not know if any app discount is applied at all, least of all what kind of discount it is.
Customer: “Can I use a restaurant voucher as well as the [E-Wallet] discount?”
The restaurant discount is something like $5 off on a minimum $20 order, and the app discount is $2 off on a minimum $10 order for partnered restaurants. After I’ve confirmed that the restaurant voucher has not been used, that the app discount is still available, and that our restaurant is definitely listed in the “Eligible Restaurants” section of that discount, I tell her:
Me: “Yes, I can apply both discounts to your order. Your total is $22, and the restaurant discount brings it down to $17. Please scan the QR code on the screen with [E-Wallet] to pay. Also, please make sure you apply the app discount and check the ‘Final Payment Amount’ before clicking the ‘Confirm Payment’ button.”
The customer’s payment goes through and I print out her receipt.
Customer: “Hey, why is the amount on the receipt still $17? I applied the app discount, as well!”
Me: “That’s because the app discount is only shown in the app. You can check the detailed breakdown in your payment history.”
Customer: “But I applied it, so the receipt should only be $15!”
Me: “Yes, if you’ve applied the app discount, then your [E-Wallet] was only charged $15. The restaurant receipt shows $17 because that is the amount we receive from [E-Wallet]. You paid $15, and another $2 is supplemented by [E-Wallet].”
Customer: “No, you don’t understand! It should be $15! You overcharged me!”
Me: “Miss, please check your payment history in [E-Wallet]. You should see that you were only charged $15.”
She does, and it does show her [E-Wallet] was deducted only $15, but somehow, she still continues to argue about the fact that the restaurant receipt does not show the app discount, and that must mean she paid $17 instead of the $15 shown in her payment history. She then demands a refund.
Me: “I’m sorry, but you will need to contact [E-Wallet] customer service. Our restaurant cannot refund you directly if the payment was made via the app.”
The customer got royally angry. Several other patrons and the restaurant owners got involved in trying to explain, yet she still didn’t get it.
Finally, the owners managed to convince the customer to contact [E-Wallet] customer service. We could hear them telling her several times that she wasn’t overcharged and that all discounts had been applied correctly.
A simple order that should have taken a few minutes was turned into a headache-worthy ordeal of two hours. The customer eventually left after [E-Wallet] customer service agreed to refund her money. Mind you, she also argued with them because she believed she was charged $17 but the app showed a refund of $15 only.
Later that night, we received a Google review about how our restaurant and [E-Wallet] were scammers and that no one should visit us or use the app. The owner got that review taken down, and we put up a board explaining the restaurant discount and app discount near the cashier counter afterward.
Related:
It’s Just Not App-ening, Part 2
It’s Just Not App-ening